Post by amirmukaddas on Mar 11, 2024 23:35:31 GMT -7
The digression is that moment in which you interrupt the logical thread of the topic you are dealing with to explore another more or less relevant, but still different, one. Digressing can be a good way to refresh users' attention, but it can also divert them and take them away from the starting topic, with negative consequences for learning. Today's article is inspired by a post in which Alberto Cogo raises one of the fundamental issues of SEO Semantics . While on the one hand analogies , rhetorical figures and metaphors can make reading a web document more fluent, is it better to use them or is this not yet the case? Alberto observed the blogs of some SEO professionals and found jokes , metaphors and sayings . With this in mind, he wonders whether this conduct is not such as to make it more difficult for articles to rank well based on the evaluation of the text.
What is SEO optimization of a text A problem that I encounter in SEO training in Italy is that the topic of SEO copywriting is completely skipped over by teachers who consider the texts to be irrelevant on the SEO side and treated superficially Denmark Telegram Number Data by those who limit themselves to providing indications on the length, heading tags, use of anchor texts, on the principles of prominence, proximity etc. SEO copywriting does not only concern guidelines for better inserting search keywords into the text , but has to do with grammar and syntax. Google does everything to capture.
The meaning of what we write and sometimes manages to do very decent things, as I report in the study on analogies , however if you want to be sure that it captures EVERYTHING you want to convey, you have to work on extreme simplification , reducing the number of subordinate clauses and excluding all idiomatic forms that require the reader's interpretation. Do you have to do it all the time? I would say no, because there is content and content. My suggestion is to simplify the communication register as much as possible when developing a guide on "pop" topics like Salvatore Aranzulla (the master) does and in general when you have strong ambitions to position your article on competitive SERPs. Don't test Google's capabilities.
What is SEO optimization of a text A problem that I encounter in SEO training in Italy is that the topic of SEO copywriting is completely skipped over by teachers who consider the texts to be irrelevant on the SEO side and treated superficially Denmark Telegram Number Data by those who limit themselves to providing indications on the length, heading tags, use of anchor texts, on the principles of prominence, proximity etc. SEO copywriting does not only concern guidelines for better inserting search keywords into the text , but has to do with grammar and syntax. Google does everything to capture.
The meaning of what we write and sometimes manages to do very decent things, as I report in the study on analogies , however if you want to be sure that it captures EVERYTHING you want to convey, you have to work on extreme simplification , reducing the number of subordinate clauses and excluding all idiomatic forms that require the reader's interpretation. Do you have to do it all the time? I would say no, because there is content and content. My suggestion is to simplify the communication register as much as possible when developing a guide on "pop" topics like Salvatore Aranzulla (the master) does and in general when you have strong ambitions to position your article on competitive SERPs. Don't test Google's capabilities.